Archive for the ‘World/Local’ Category

Henry Rollins: Uncut in Northern Ireland

Monday, December 7th, 2009

I’ll admit I’m late to the game in figuring out what’s been going on in the world.  My high school had a decent enough American History course, though I didn’t go much beyond that and my interest in those areas were never all that high.  I’m blooming late, then, and it’s an amazing transformation to see how what I thought I knew was so blatantly on the surface.

I’m a huge, huge fan of Henry Rollins, both by seeing him speak live and by his many videos and his “dispatches” on henryrollins.com.  I admittedly have not read any of his books; yet.

As an avid Netflix fan, I tonight found and watched the IFC’s “Henry Rollins” Uncut video where Henry is in Northern Ireland.  Needless to say, the particular footage and interviews and commentary were enough to set my blood on fire and making me really wanting to know more.

In general I try not to regurgitate the bulk of the content on which I am reviewing, and I’m going to follow that trend here.  If you have any interest in the situation, I feel strongly that you should watch the piece through for yourself, as it won’t take too long (less than an hour) and is rather well packed.  Namely, Henry interviews a variety of different people from both the IRA and from Union members as well as some other local figures.

What is incredible to me is how those who were interviewed iterated that it was not a fight between Protestant and Catholics, but between independence and rule by the United Kingdom.  What little I did hear about the conflicts in the early 90s hardly ever voiced this sentiment, and the idea that it was an imperial rather than a secular war is just insanity.  The effect of the media and how it constructs and manipulates public opinion is huge; if not to those who are directly involved and know better, but to anyone else in the world who is thereby cut off from proper access to the bolded points which affect so many people.  Furthermore, the mass of current doubt as to whether the current systems are sustainable, and the extent to which the current society is segregated rather than truly “in peace” is very seriously a story which has not been brought to proper light.  Rising fences, constant security, and other forms of military presence are all elements that I, in cheery Boston, cannot even conceive; and this is speaking to only the current “benevolent” state of where they are now, saying nothing to decades of conflict.

There are clearly many more aspects to the story, though I certainly got a good primer in the discussion held by this particular video piece.  I look forward to learning more.

Newscorp vs. Google

Monday, November 23rd, 2009

A little while ago I wrote about my news practice, in part of which I noted that I have a problem with the way that so much content is available for free, supported by online advertising.  Now, not too much farther into the future, Rupert Murdoch is talking about pulling all of his content out of Google, and today we learned that he is currently in talks with Microsoft towards completing this end.

Free implies easy access, and access to information has long been the eventual goal of the Google corporation.  There are a lot of wonderful benefits that come with having information readily available, and in the end it gives us all a bit more power and knowledge.  Murdoch’s move, then, is opposite these directives.  In some frightening application of spin, I can see that the privatized content is supposedly marked as “premium” and more authoritative than cheap or “lowly” alternatives.  I just hope that, in this particular case, that doesn’t attract much attention.

Journalism is incredibly important, and I don’t want to see it go away.  With free options and so many difficulties in finding funding, it’s scary to think that we could go into the dark because of market patterns.  In some ways, charging for content can be and should be a good thing.  I want to help pay, if only in small amounts, to have people find the stories and the underlying problems that happen on both world and local scales.

The trouble, then, is that Murdoch isn’t making this move to stay afloat; it’s a power play designed to generate more profit in an attempt to further whatever agendas he sees fit.  Are we going to see RIAA and MPAA equivalents, finding and persecuting anyone who seems to have copied a Newscorp feed?  Copyright and protection seems a logical extension of this ethos, though I imagine they’ll move slowly enough that it’s off the radar until a few years down the road.

I hope that I’m just being a bit paranoid, though if so many people already can put on Fox news and consider it to “fair and balanced” in any way, shape, or form, it’s not too much of a leap to think of other ways in which the bulk of the population can be manipulated and followed down other dark alleys.  Google needs to keep doing what it’s doing, and in the best case this will be a very public wrong step for Murdoch and other similar conglomerates.

Malcolm Gladwell: “Outliers”

Tuesday, November 10th, 2009

I don’t have all that many problems with Malcolm Gladwell.  As I wrote about Blink, he is a very good writer, and his style is incredibly accessible.

The first third of Outliers was rather exciting.  I’m not so much a fan of hockey, though I do work in computers; and in the computing world, when you’re born certainly can have a big influence on whether you’re behind or ahead of the curve.  Gladwell goes through both youth hockey leagues and innovators in computing to find what it is that sets certain people apart from the crowd.  For hockey players, being born near a cutoff date is most important.  For computing, being born early enough to predate the tech booms and having ample access to programming workstations before anyone else allowed Bill Gates and others to spearhead their own computing revolutions.  The law of 10,000 hours is likewise very intriguing; I won’t give any more of it away, since you can most likely find more information on Google or Wikipedia.

Where Outliers takes a wrong turn, in my opinion, is when Gladwell moves on from hockey and computers and starts to analyze cultural differences and sociological differences.  There is a short sentence or two which marks the beginning of this analysis,whereby Gladwell tersely notes that it can potentially be dangerous to speak in terms of cultural generalities, and that this kind of thinking can easily turn towards racism and stereotyping.  He does not come back to this point, as though a few words are enough to stem the tides of how popular opinion will look upon these words.

The reality is that it just isn’t realistic to talk for pages on end about what makes people from the South violent; or why Asians have trouble asserting themselves, all under the guise that no one is going to use these studies, framed as scientific fact, for less than noble purposes.  In a certain context some of his analysis would be OK: framed with great caution and repeated understanding that generalities about culture do not necessarily describe the people who fall into these categories, we may be able to get away without more bad stereotypes or distaste of the other.  In a mass market book, however, without adequate framing, I feel that it’s a wrong step to jump into such a discussion.  Perhaps in the future we can deal with these kinds of issues in a more conscious manner, though sweeping racism under the rug as a theoretical detail is not what I consider to be responsible.

Current news practice

Sunday, November 1st, 2009

I was a math, science, and computer geek in high school, and while I also took my AP history and AP lit classes, I certainly wasn’t all that connected to the world around me.  That is, I rarely followed the news, to the point where most of what got filtered into my head was via word of mouth.  I then became a math major in college, which, again, has little to do with current events.

At this point I can’t say that I’m all that much more advanced.  I do, however, have a desire to keep up on what’s happening, with a limited amount of time to do so.  Computer work, sound work, media, and other forms of reading seem to seep away the time, though I’ve been making roads towards something like awareness.

Since I picked up my Sony Reader Touch, I’ve been using the wonderful calibre software by Kovid Goyal.  One great feature of this software is that it allows for automated download of the daily web version of the New York Times which then can be sent over to the Reader.  While the free web version is a cut down version, the Sunday editions easily gross over 1,000 pages in the electronic format.  Weekday editions are about half that size, on average.  As much time as I like to dedicate to seeding my head with the various articles, there’s just been too much to take in, even over the course of the day.

Previously, I tried out CNN via Google Reader to do about the same job.   The Times, however, has some amazing writers and editors, and I haven’t found any source to be quite as good in that regard.  I have tried out other sites from time to time, though I keep coming back to them and have never been disappointed.  Moreover, being able to have that content in quasi-paper form on my Reader is incredibly useful, especially for longer articles which are a bit tougher to get through via computer monitor.

Freeloading and subscriptions

The reality of newspapers is that they’re having a lot of financial trouble.  Especially outlets which still have an actual print version, such as the Times and the Boston Globe, it has been increasingly hard for them to compete with other free sources of information online.

The Times does currently have a subscription model via an Adobe Air application called the Times Reader.  For $3.50/week, you can get the same content as I’m getting now with calibre, but in a desktop-only client.  You can, from within the application, print each article to a PDF; though they are images, not text, which drives the filesize way up.  Compared to having the content in EPUB or LRF or PDF in one step, it’s certainly a step backward, and is certainly not adding any lasting value for me.

Effectively, the cost of the Times Reader is there to stave off the cost of the missing ads from the free the web version; to most web users, however, it is easy enough to ignore the ads without any real cost.  This is a fundamental problem with most newspapers in this digital age, and I hope that in the future there are more options out there which allow for cheap yet not-free access to good content.

I don’t personally own a Kindle, though my understanding is that this is the closest thing to a reasonable subscription model for newspapers.  Sony will release their Reader Daily Edition in the next few months, too, which has wireless access and, hopefully, some reasonable subscription options.  As always, this is also a spot for DRM to rear its ugly head; however, with wireless delivery to the device alone, and the inability to draw the articles back off the device via USB, etc., this seems like a reasonable compromise.