I don’t subscribe to Forbes magazine, though for some reason this didn’t stop the latest issue from being delivered to my mailbox at work. January’s cover, in any case, reads, “Company of the Year: Monsanto”; and just seeing the headline with the image of Hugh Grant in a corn-colored sun-ray image gave me a unsettling feeling, that somehow the world has once again turned upside-down.
If Monsanto is, indeed, company of the year, then we must all be that much more wary of what the word “company” has began to imply. The article at Forbes shows figures of market domination and increased profits, despite some pesky “vicious criticism” of the “Satan of agriculture.”
It’s not hard to find counter-arguments, to unravel the horrific stories of what this one particular corporate entity has done for our food supply, for our farming industry, and even for our health. A one word search in Google for “Monsanto” may at first pull up the company’s own website; though quickly following this hit are countless articles, videos, and other resources telling of the troubles Monsanto has generated in the wake of its profits.
Currently, the articles on Forbes.com has 67 comments; and here, at least, the results are encouraging. Former supporters of the magazine have mentioned their desire to terminate their subscription, and have angrily outcried at the absurdity of the faux-”journalism” that took place in order to make the original article suitable for print. If you have not heard of the problems created from Monsanto, this is a perfect opportunity to start.